Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 7, 1974No. 74-22, C.A.D. 1134PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 71 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 4483, 371 F. Supp. 1393 (1973), overruling-in part appellants’ consolidated protests against the classification of merchandise imported from England in 1966 and 1969. We affirm.

The merchandise consists of miniature electrical devices, invoiced as microphones, coils, and receivers, which the Government concedes were intended for assembly into hearing aids.1 Appellants claim the goods are classifiable under item 709.50, TSUS, as parts of hearing aids. The microphones and receivers were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Herbert G. Schwarz, Dba Ski Imports v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. Knowles Electronics J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carling Electric Co., (Carlingswitch, Inc.) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. ASEA, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. Whirlpool Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Ehrenreich Photo-Optical Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API