Legal Opinion

Knowles Electronics J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 19, 1973No. C.D. 4483; Court Nos. 69/1961 and 70/45630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

These two cases, consolidated for trial without objection, involve merchandise imported from England and entered at Chicago in November 1966 (protest 69/1961) and November 1969 (protest 70/45630).

Tke imported merchandise is of three classes, viz: micropkones, receivers, and coils which plaintiffs in tkeir complaints (depending on the date of importation) claim are properly classifiable at 12 per cen-tum and 9.5 per centum ad valorem as parts of kearing aids, dutiable under TSUS item 709.50, or alternatively (by amendment, without objection) at 11.5 per centum and 9 per centum ad…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Robert Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Arthur J. Humphreys, Packard-Bell Electronics v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ASEA, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Kyle Rayome v. ABT Electronics Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API