Whirlpool Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”) challenges the decision of the United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) to classify its imported merchandise (entry number 327-0126404-9) under Heading 9032 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) 1999 as an “[a]utomatic regulating or controlling instrument! ] and apparatus” at a duty rate of 1.7% ad valo-rem. 1 This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a), and jurisdiction is uncontested by the parties. Because the subject merchandise is classified under an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Totes, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Belimo Automation A.G. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013