Marin Municipal Water District v. Dolge
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the auditor of the Marin Municipal Water District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George H. Harlan, Curtis H. Lindley, and Henry Eichkoff, for Petitioners.
1Opinion of the Court
This is a proceeding in mandamus by the Marin Municipal Water District and its directors to compel William Dolge, as auditor of said district, to countersign certain bonds so that the same may be issued by said district.
The bonds were prepared for issue in pursuance of an election duly called and held for that purpose in accordance with the act authorizing the formation of such districts. (Stats. 1911, p. 1290; Stats. (Sp. Sess.) 1911, p. 92.) It is alleged that the bonds were presented to the auditor, and he was asked to countersign the same but refused to do so.
The case comes clearly within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Keech v. JoplinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Quint v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
- City of Los Angeles v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Taylor v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Thoits v. ByxbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.