Hooker v. East Riverside Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the superior court entered upon an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to her amended and supplemental complaint (hereinafter referred to as “the complaint”) without leave to amend. The demurrer is both general and special, the latter presenting numerous grounds, of which we deem it necessary to consider here only those which plead the statute of limitations. All of the special statutes of limitation which may be appropriate thereto are pleaded by the demurrer to any and every cause of action alleged in the complaint.
Prom the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hughson v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Nichols v. Canoga IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- O'Connell v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.