Legal Opinion

McCauslin v. Reliance Finance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2000PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrosky, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment 1 that included, inter alia, an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $12,000. Appellant, Reliance Finance Company, raises two issues for our consideration, whether the Court failed to consider the relevant factors in awarding attorney’s fees in the amount of $12,000; and whether the Court improperly failed to provide Appellant a full opportunity to present its position with regard to the issue of attorney’s fees? We vacate and remand.

¶2 The present case evolved from the repossession of an automobile by the lien-holder (Appellant) from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Sewak v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Conrad v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Croft v. P & W Foreign Car Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Skurnowicz v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Boehm, R. v. Riversource Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API