Legal Opinion

Skurnowicz v. Lucci

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 2002PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.

¶ 1 Appellants Frank and Janice Skur-nowicz and appellees Joseph and Joan Lucci both appeal from the lower court’s July 12, 2001, order. This order denied all of appellees’ post-trial motions, and granted appellants’ post-trial motions in part and denied them in part. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

¶ 2 In early 1997, appellees, who then lived at 3980 Larkspur Drive, Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania (hereinafter the “property” or “premises”), placed their property on the market for $229,900. Ap-pellees then reduced their asking price to $189,900 in June of that year.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Sewak v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. James Freeman v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API