Legal Opinion

Piper Rudnick LLP v. Hartz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 2005No. 84, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

This is the latest chapter in the dispute between the late Sigmund Stanley Hartz’s beneficiaries and his personal representative. Previously, the personal representative successfully defended against the beneficiaries’ attempt to remove and surcharge him. In this case, we must decide, pursuant to Md.Code (1974, 2001 Repl.Vol., 2004 Cum.Supp.), § 7-603 of the Estates and Trusts Article, 1 whether the personal representative is entitled to pay counsel fees incurred in that defense from the corpus of the estate. We shall answer this question affirmatively and reverse.

I

Appellants Brian Goldman,…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Loveday v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Management Personnel Services, Inc. v. SandefurCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Comptroller of the Treasury v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Matter of Estate of PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Downes v. DownesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API