State v. Patterson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal asserts constitutional error based on an alleged geographical rule requiring a trial court confronted with conflicting decisions to follow the decision of the division of the court of appeals within which it is located. Finding that no such rule exists, we affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence.
I
¶ 2 On June 9, 2008, a jury found Appellant Maurice Patterson guilty of possession of narcotic drugs. Subsequently, the State proved that Patterson had two prior drug convictions: one for attempted possession or use of narcotic drugs and one for possession of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Esgardo Javier NevarezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists CharteredCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. GulliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Dave Allen LaporteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
- State v. BouckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.