Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Cabinet Co. v. Herrman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1893No. 842PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This action was instituted by appellee, against appellant, to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract, the terms of which will be hereinafter stated.

The issues joined were submitted to a jury for trial; but, after the evidence was heard, the jury, by agreement of the parties, was dismissed, and a special finding of the facts was made by the court, and on the conclusions of law thereon stated, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee, for $426.65.

Each party excepted to the conclusions of law, and appellee appealed to general term, where errors were properly assigned by each of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holland v. ReaMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Cottrell v. CottrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Schreiber v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Detrick v. McGloneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Raymond v. RhodesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Xenia Real Estate Co. v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Smith v. FrantzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Taylor Cotton Oil Co. v. Early-Foster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Ault Woodenware Co. v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API