Legal Opinion

Ault Woodenware Co. v. Baker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1900No. 3,192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

Action for damages resulting from a personal injury alleged to have been received by appellee while in appellant’s employ. »

The fact's upon which appellee relies, as stated in his complaint, are substantially as follows: That appellant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Ohio; that said appellant operates a factory in Morgan county, Indiana, wherein are made buckets and other woodenware; that in said factory there is run and operated a certain machine known as a planer, which was driven and operated by steam; that in connection with said planer there is used a hood and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Cabinet Co. v. HerrmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Bradley v. ElyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Reid v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Spence v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Dutch v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Kessler v. Mercur Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Adams Express Co. v. SchofieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Van Avery v. Platte Valley Land & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Application of City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API