Legal Opinion
Erickson v. Croft
Montana Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1988No. 88-086PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson
David Erickson (Erickson) and Starhaven Ranch (Starhaven) appeal a Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaverhead County, grant of summary judgment to defendants real estate broker Larry Rule (Rule), attorney John Warren (Warren), and the Dillon, Montana law firm of Schultz, Davis & Warren. We affirm.
This case is related to the litigation involved in Erickson v. First National Bank of Minneapolis (Mont. 1985), [215 Mont. 350,] 697 P.2d 1332, 42 St.Rep. 423. In Erickson we determined that the First National Bank of Minneapolis had properly quieted title as against Erickson to certain ranch property…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Jones v. Tracy School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Harrison v. ChanceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Tin Cup County Water v. Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Lozeau v. GEICO Indemnity Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Billings Clinic v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.