Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Broomal

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1893No. 5125PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the. district court of Lancaster county-Heard below before Hall, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The court erred in overruling the motion to transfer the case to the law docket and impanel a jury for the trial of the same, and erred in refusing to impanel a jury in the equity court to try the issues of fact.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the. district court of Lancaster county-Heard below before Hall, J. The opinion contains a statement of the case. The court erred in overruling the motion to transfer the case to the law docket and impanel a jury for the trial of the same, and erred in refusing to impanel a jury in the equity court to try the issues of fact. (Code, secs. 100,101, 280, 281; Dale v. Ilunneman, 12 Neb., 225; Lamasler v. Seofield, 5 Id., 149; Belts v. Sims, 25 Id., 184; Dohle v. Omaha Foundry, 15 Id., 437; Davis v. Morris, 36 N. Y., 572; Ladd v. James, 10 O. Sfc., 438; Keller v. Wenzell, 23 Id., 579;…

1Opinion of the Court

' Ragan, C.

March 1, 1889, appellant was a grain dealer in Nebraska and appellees were commission merchants in Chicago, Illinois. These parties entered into a written contract bearing said date, in words and figures as follows:

“This agreement, made this first day of March, 1889, by and between Wanzer & Co., of Chicago, Illinois, of the first part, and J. C. Morrissey, of Lincoln, Nebraska, of the second part, witnesseth as follows: Wanzer & Co. agree to loan to said 'Morrissey a sum not exceeding thirty thousand dollars, to be used in the purchase of corn and .other grain, seeds, etc., in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Gormley v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Embrey v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Cockle v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  3. Department of Housing & Community Development v. MullenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Johnson Lakes Development Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kahn v. JanowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API