Rothstein v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
Following the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress, appellant, Fred Michael Rothstein, pled guilty to (1) possession with intent to deliver more than four grams but less than four hundred grams of psilocybin; and (2) possession of less than twenty abuse units of lysergic acid diethyl-amide (“LSD”). 1 Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.113, 481.1151 (Vernon 2003). In this consolidated appeal, appellant, in a single issue, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Finding no error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
Two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Cesar Gomez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Brenda Fay Nelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Theadric Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Ashton Joel Carmen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.