Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 11, 2008No. 14-07-00629-CRPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.

Following the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress, appellant, Fred Michael Rothstein, pled guilty to (1) possession with intent to deliver more than four grams but less than four hundred grams of psilocybin; and (2) possession of less than twenty abuse units of lysergic acid diethyl-amide (“LSD”). 1 Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.113, 481.1151 (Vernon 2003). In this consolidated appeal, appellant, in a single issue, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Finding no error, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Two…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Cesar Gomez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Brenda Fay Nelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  4. Theadric Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Ashton Joel Carmen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API