Legal Opinion

Theadric Lee v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 19, 2013No. 14-12-00615-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. BRETT BUSBY, Justice.

In a single issue, appellant Theadric Lee challenges his conviction of felony murder. He argues that the State violated his rights under the Confrontation Clauses of the United States and Texas Constitutions by, among other things, introducing an autopsy report without providing an opportunity to cross-examine the medical examiner who prepared it. See U.S. Const. amend. VI; Tex. Const. art. I § 10. 1 We conclude that the State did violate appellant’s rights — it now concedes as much— but the violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We therefore affirm.

Ba…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jason Alexander Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  2. State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Diamond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Pedro Antonio Segovia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  5. Michele Marie Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API