Theadric Lee v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. BRETT BUSBY, Justice.
In a single issue, appellant Theadric Lee challenges his conviction of felony murder. He argues that the State violated his rights under the Confrontation Clauses of the United States and Texas Constitutions by, among other things, introducing an autopsy report without providing an opportunity to cross-examine the medical examiner who prepared it. See U.S. Const. amend. VI; Tex. Const. art. I § 10. 1 We conclude that the State did violate appellant’s rights — it now concedes as much— but the violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We therefore affirm.
Ba…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Jason Alexander Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Diamond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Pedro Antonio Segovia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Michele Marie Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.