Vidal v. American General Companies
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
Vidal, plaintiff below, appeals the district court’s grant of American General Fire & Casualty Company’s (American General) motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion, determining that because plaintiff had violated a clause in its insurance policy with American General by settling with a third-party tort-feasor without the insurer’s consent, the company was not obligated to pay Vidal’s underinsured motorist claim. Vidal contends that the trial court should consider the factual issue of whether American General’s own settlement with the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Far West Financial Corp. v. D & S CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- March v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Harrison v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baker v. HedstromNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Bennett v. KislukNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Valdez v. R-WAY, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Baker v. HedstromNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Bennett v. KislukNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.