Legal Opinion

Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1955PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The following three issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Was it error for the trial court to permit the defendants to file an amended answer on the day of trial, so as to set up additional defenses based upon the prior compromise settlement and the order dismissing the circuit court action ?(2) Is the order of dismissal of the circuit court action commenced by Tronca against Heinemann, in which Tronca was plaintiff and Heinemann defendant, res adjudícala as to the rights of the plaintiffs to recover in the instant action ?(3) Are the plaintiffs estopped from bringing the instant action by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Giles v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Foremost Dairies Inc. v. Campbell Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Keller v. KeklikianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Jetton v. PolkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Wieding v. KrischCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. A.B.C.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Bank Southeast, N.A.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mensing v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Lugena v. HannaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Smith v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API