Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Kisluk
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1991No. 19294Published
1Opinion of the Court
814 P.2d 89 (1991)
112 N.M. 221
Joan M. BENNETT, Petitioner,
v.
Dick KISLUK, Respondent.
No. 19294.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
June 26, 1991.
Rehearing Denied August 9, 1991.
Morrison & Martinez, Robert Dale Morrison, Albuquerque, for petitioner.
Freedman, Boyd & Daniels, John W. Boyd, Albuquerque, for respondent.
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
Joan Bennett sued her former attorney, Dick Kisluk, alleging malpractice, intentional infliction of emotional suffering, and misrepresentations that warranted treble damages under NMSA 1978, Section 36-2-17 (Repl.Pamp. 1984) (attorney guilty of deceit or collusion…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. MaddouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Universal Life Church v. CoxonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- First State Bank v. MuzioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Bennett v. KislukNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Harrison v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.