Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hedstrom

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2013No. Docket 33,635PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Justice.

This appeal concerns whether defendant professional corporations and a limited liability company are “health care providers” as defined by the Medical Malpractice Act (“MMA” or “the Act”), NMSA 1978, Sections 41-5-1 to -29 (1976, as amended through 2008), so as to be able to receive the benefits of the Act. Although the Court of Appeals determined that Defendants do not literally meet the Act’s definition of “health care provider,” it nonetheless held that the Defendants are health care providers under the Act because a strict adherence to the plain language of the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Wilschinsky Ex Rel. Wilschinsky v. MedinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. AlmanzarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Griego v. OliverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Peña v. GreffetDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  4. Lujan Grisham v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Pirtle v. Legis. CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API