Legal Opinion

Brown v. Coca-Cola Bottling, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1959No. 34833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff. The nature of the action is fairly summarized in the trial court’s instruction No.-I to the jury, as follows:

“This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff Wilmer O. Brown as the result of drinking part of the contents of a bottle of a soft drink called Coca-Cola, bottled by the defendant corporation.
“The Coca-Cola was consumed on June 6, 1957. Plaintiff alleges that this bottle of Coca-Cola contained broken glass and that plaintiff swallowed some of the glass before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. People v. . Jung HingNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. HantoverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. Hollingsworth v. Washington Mutual Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Sorenson v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Shillingstad v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API