Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 20, 1988No. 10270-6-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.

Defendants, manufacturers of asbestos products, appeal a judgment in favor of Lyle Sorenson, who suffers asbestos-related impairments. Sorenson was employed at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard for many years, from the early 1940's through the mid-1970's. Although he did not work with asbestos products personally, he frequently did work in areas where these products were applied or removed, and where asbestos dust filled the air.

In 1980, Sorenson's physician determined that Sorenson had asbestosis, which later worsened, and pulmonary disease related to his habit of smoking cigarettes. A more recent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Brown v. MacPherson's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Palmer v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Beeman v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation FundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. Mohr v. GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API