Legal Opinion

People v. Lua

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 2017No. E064038PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

A jury found defendant and appellant David Ismael Lua guilty of one count of transportation for sale of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, 1 § 11379, subd. (a); count 1), as well as a misdemeanor count of simple possession of a controlled substance (§ 11377, subd. (a); count 2), a lesser included offense of the charged offense, possession for sale of a controlled substance (§ 11378, subd. (1)). The trial court found true allegations that defendant had five drug-related prior convictions (§ 11370.2, subd. (c)) and had served three prior prison terms…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. CarmonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. Morrison, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. Franklin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. Espinoza, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. McCloud, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Milad Iskander v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API