Legal Opinion

People v. Lachuk

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1935No. Crim. 2671PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

The defendant was charged in four counts of an information with the separate crimes of rape and incest with his own sixteen year old daughter, alleged to have been committed on July 12, 1934, and on July, f 27, 1934. A plea of not guilty was entered and the case tried before the court without a jury, defendant being convicted on all four counts.

During the trial the court permitted the prosecution to amend the information by changing the date of one of each of the offenses of rape and incest from July 12, 1934, to June 20, 1934. No objection was made by defendant to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. MeravigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. BechtelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API