Legal Opinion
Kroll v. Reeser
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1982No. 6035PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Donald Reeser lost part of his right ring finger as the result of an injury incurred while working. In this workers’ compensation appeal, the question is whether he was an employee of the owner of the premises, Ed Kroll, or of his father, Robert Reeser.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Kroll was a serviceman with a cable TV company in Juneau. In his spare time, he was helping to build a four-plex on a lot he owned. The building was to consist of three one-bedroom apartments and quarters for Kroll and his family.
In the summer of 1976, the original building contractor fell behind…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Searfus v. Northern Gas CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Ostrem v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Selid Construction Co. v. Guarantee Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1960
- Ruble v. Arctic General, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Nickels v. NapolilliAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Croxton v. Crowley Maritime Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Odsather v. RichardsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United Paperworkers International UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Cluff v. Nana-MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.