Legal Opinion

Croxton v. Crowley Maritime Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1991No. S-3512PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the superior court after a bench trial. The Estate of Ruth Croxton (the Estate) sought to hold Crowley Maritime Corporation (Crowley), the parent company of Croxton’s employer, vicariously liable for the alleged negligence of Tim Morrison, which it claimed was a cause of the work-related plane accident that took Croxton’s life. The court agreed with the Estate that Morrison was negligent and that the negligence was a proximate cause of Croxton’s death. The court also found, however, that Morrison was not an employee of Crowley…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Elliott v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stratman v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re BonhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1998
  2. Manor v. Nestle Food Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sauve v. WinfreeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pister v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Williams v. Mammoth of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API