Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Murray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1895No. Nos. 9433—(194)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Willis, J., denying a motion for judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

CANTY, J.2

This is a second appeal by plaintiff in this action. The first appeal was from the judgment. See 58 Minn. 385, 59 N. W. 1038. The only order made by this court on the decision of that appeal was simply to reverse the judgment. On the judgment entered thereon the case was remanded to the court below for such further proceedings "as may be necessary, just, and proper.” Thereupon the defendants moved the court below for leave to amend their answer, and plaintiff made a cross motion for judgment. Both motions were made on the pleadings, findings, and mandate from this court, and were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Babcock v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. State ex rel. Broderick v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Cool v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Lawton v. FiskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Babcock v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API