Babcock v. Murray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Charles D. Kerr, J., denying their motion for a new trial, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action upon one of a series of seven promissory notes for $1,000 each, made by the defendants and Richard Deming, who died before the bringing of the action, to the plaintiff.
This is the third appeal herein. The first trial resulted in a judgment for the defendants, from which plaintiff appealed, resulting in a reversal of the judgment. See Babcock v. Murray, 58 Minn. 385, 59 N. W. 1038, to which reference is here made for a statement of *200the facts of this case. The result of the second appeal — 61 Minn. 408, 63 N. W. 1076 — was that the case was remanded to-the district court with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lukens v. HazlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Babcock v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Babcock v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Rantala v. HaishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Schwantz v. KleiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Citizens' Bank v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925