Cool v. Kelly
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Steele county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Buck-ham, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Action in ejectment to recover possession of one hundred sixty acres of land under claim of ownership in fee.
An appeal was taken from a former judgment of the district court, whereby it was decreed that plaintiff was the owner and entitled to possession of the entire tract. This court held that as to thirty-three acres, specifically described in the answer, the vital finding of fact was not supported by the evidence, and reversed the judgment, without special directions as to future proceedings. 78 Minn. 102, 80 N. W. 861. The discredited finding of fact absolutely disposed of a defense…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Cool v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- National Investment Co. v. National Savings, Loan & Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Backus v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Jordan v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Broderick v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Lawton v. FiskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Yager v. HeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- O'Rourke v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916