Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Company and Northern Pacific Railroad Company from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Morris, J., setting aside an order for judgment in favor of defendants and the judgment entered thereon and granting a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This is the third time this case has been before this court. 48 Minn. 339, 51 N. W. 221; 61 Minn. 18, 63 N. W. 1. After the cause was remanded on the last appeal, and on August 20, 1S95, the defendant railroad companies moved for judgment.in their favor on the findings of fact, the mandate of this court, and ofi the files and records in the action. This motion was granted on September 14, but with a stay of proceedings for 20 days with leave to plaintiff to move for a new trial. On October 5, the stay having expired, judgment was entered in favor of the defendant railway companies that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth R. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Butterfield v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- National Investment Co. v. National Savings, Loan & Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chapman v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Oregon Mortgage Co., Ltd. v. KunnekeMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Hanson v. IngwaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- National Surety Co. v. WittichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.