Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1987No. 01037PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This case presents a difficult question regarding the parameters and application of the “malfunction theory” in a strict product liability action.

The malfunction theory has been part of the law of strict liability in Pennsylvania since 1969 when this Court decided MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co., 214 Pa.Super. 384, 257 A.2d 676 (1969), allocatur denied. In MacDougall, the Court held "... that the occurrence of a malfunction of machinery in the absence of abnormal use and reasonable secondary causes is evidence of a ‘defective condition’ within the meaning of § 402A____” Id., 214…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Sherk v. DAISY-HEDDON, ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Schlier v. Milwaukee Electrical Tool Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Gordner v. Dynetics Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Andrusis, C. v. Microvention, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API