Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gordner v. Dynetics Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1994No. 4:CV-93-1124PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND:

On July 22,1993, plaintiff Ruth J. Gordner initiated this action by filing a complaint against defendant Dynetics Corporation alleging that she suffered injuries caused by the breaking of a part on a machine made by Dynetics. Dynetics on September 28, 1993, filed a third-party complaint against McMaster-Carr Supply Co. and B & G Mfg. Co., as makers of the component part alleged to have failed.

Before the court are motions for summary judgment filed by all defendants, based upon plaintiffs failure to produce the allegedly defective product.

DISCUSSION:

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Childers v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Hofer v. Gap, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  3. Townsend v. American Insulated Panel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  4. Meadows v. Anchor Longwall and Rebuild, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Parkinson v. Guidant Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API