Stambaugh v. Butler
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentJones, Judge
¶ 19 The unambiguous language of a statute is not made ambiguous simply by virtue of its longstanding misapplication. In Arizona, persons owning range livestock are required to adopt and record a brand with the Arizona Department of Agriculture (the Department), which they may then affix to their livestock to provide evidence of ownership. A.R.S. §§ 3-1261(A), -1267(B), -1371(1), (4). Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 3-1261(B) unequivocally states, “[n]o two brands of the same design or figure shall be adopted or recorded.”
¶ 20 Here, the parties agree the bar seven brands issued by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Chaparral Development v. RMED International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.