Legal Opinion

Stambaugh v. Butler

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 9, 2016No. 1 CA-CV 14-0817PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge:

¶ 1 David Stambaugh appeals the superior court’s ruling upholding the recording by Defendants Donald Butler, Suzette Taylor, the Atizona Department of Agriculture (Department) and the State of Arizona (collectively, Defendants) of the Eureka Springs Cattle Co. livestock brand. The Eureka Springs brand is identical to Stambaugh’s brand, but placed in a different location on the animal. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Stambaugh is the owner in Arizona of the bar seven brand1 applied to the left hip of his cattle. Eureka Springs owns the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Long v. DickArizona Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Marriage of Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API