Legal Opinion

Ehret v. Price

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 1927No. 14678PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This was an action against the Oklahoma City Ditch & Water Power Company, a corporation, and other defendants, by Anna W. Price, to recover on cei'tain ' corporate bonds'' of said' Ditch • & Power Company and to foreclose' a mort.gage lien’, given to secure payment of. said bonds, on certain lots in. Oklahoma City. Said corporation had issued its bonds, 50 in number, each of the face value of $500, aggregating the sum of $25,000, and had executed a trust deed to one Joseph S. Chick, as trustee, which'contained a'mortgage clauste, to secure the payment of such bonds. Plaintiff, Anna' W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toledo, Delphos & Burlington Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Slater v. BreeseMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Edminster v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Usina & Jones v. WilderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  5. Thomson v. Madison Building & Aid Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  3. State Bank of Seneca v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Trosper v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Jackson v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API