Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Madison Building & Aid Ass'n

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1885No. 11,999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Jefferson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first paragraph of the appellee’s complaint declares upon a note and mortgage executed by the ■appellants to John C. Smith.

It is contended that this paragraph of the complaint is bad because it does not aver that the note and mortgage were assigned to the appellee. This position is not tenable.

Where the complaint is against the maker of a note, it is sufficient to show title in' the plaintiff, and this may be done by alleging that it was sold and assigned to him. The appellants confuse this case with an action founded upon an *280endorsement brought against an endorser; whereas the two cases…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Boyd v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hinkle v. ShelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Oil-Well Supply Co. v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Copeland v. State ex rel. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ehret v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API