Usina & Jones v. Wilder
Supreme Court of Georgia
Mortgage. Description. Estoppel. Consideration. Before Judge Tompkins. Cbatbam Superior Court. May Term, 1876. Wilder instituted proceedings to foreclose a mortgage ex-edited by Usina & Jones and tbe Savannah Dry Dock Company, the material portions of which are set forth in the first head-note.
Read the full summary
Mortgage. Description. Estoppel. Consideration. Before Judge Tompkins. Cbatbam Superior Court. May Term, 1876. Wilder instituted proceedings to foreclose a mortgage ex-edited by Usina & Jones and tbe Savannah Dry Dock Company, the material portions of which are set forth in the first head-note. The defendants showed for cause why said mortgage should not be foreclosed, as follows: 1. That the description of the property in the mortgage is too indefinite. 2. That the mortgage does not embrace any land, because, at the time of its execution, the defendants did not have any right, title, or…
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Judge.
With the several pleas of the defendant, which were stricken on demurrer, set out in the report of the facts of this case, the reasons in law on which our judgment is based will be apparent from the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Hill v. O'Bryan Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Thomas v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Wagnon v. PeaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Pancoast v. Travelers InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.