Legal Opinion

People v. Bodjack

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1920No. Docket No. 115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Berrien; White (Charles E.), J. Paul Bodjack was convicted of violating the liquor-law.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case is here upon exceptions before sentence. The defendant was informed against in the *445circuit court for having in his possession in the county of Berrien, on the 2d day of May, 1919, certain intoxicating liquors, to wit: 12 bottles of whisky, in violation of Act No. 338, Pub. Acts 1917, as amended by Act Ño. 53, Pub. Acts 1919, as amended by Act No. 3, of the Extra Session of 1919. Upon the trial it was the claim of the people that the defendant had violated section 2 of the act.

The defendant was the proprietor of a restaurant and soft drink parlor in St. Joseph, Berrien county. Early…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LambrechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Bronk v. RileyNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Todd v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Heinze v. St. Joseph Township School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. SkrypczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Heinze v. St. Joseph Township School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API