Legal Opinion
Bronk v. Riley
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion
On motion for a temporary injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtMayham, J.
On the 10th of February, 1888, John McEwen, as superintendent of the Albany penitentiary, as party of the first part, with the written approval of the commissioners of the Albany penitentiary, entered into a contract with the plaintiff, of which the following is a copy: “Agreement, made the 10th day of February, 1888, between John McEwen, superintendent of the Albany penitentiary, of the first part, and Edgar Bronk, of the city of Albany, N. Y., of the second part, witnessetli, that the said first party, pursuant to the authority in him vested by resolution of the commissioners of the Albany…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Commissioners of Central ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Benton v. . WickwireNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Swift v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- American Life Insurance and Trust Company v. Van EpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Devlin v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. BodjackMichigan Supreme Court · 1920