Legal Opinion

Heinze v. St. Joseph Township School District No. 1

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1953No. Docket 25, Calendar 45,787Published

1Opinion of the Court

336 Mich. 552 (1953)

58 N.W.2d 920

HEINZE

v.

ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1.

Docket No. 25, Calendar No. 45,787.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 8, 1953.

Arthur G. Preston, Jr., for all plaintiffs.

John T. Ryan, for plaintiffs Heinze and Colby.

John L. Crow, for defendant.

BOYLES, J.

The St. Joseph city school district and 2 resident taxpayers filed this bill of complaint to enjoin the defendant St. Joseph township school district from exercising any authority over a certain area in the township which plaintiffs claim had been legally annexed to the city school district. The circuit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Attorney General of Michigan Ex Rel. Kies v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Kies v. LowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Barbour v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. Stormfeltz-Loveley Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API