Legal Opinion

Heinze v. St. Joseph Township School District No. 1

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1953No. Docket 25, Calendar 45,787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boyles, J."

The St. Joseph city school district and 2 resident taxpayers filed this bill of complaint to enjoin the defendant St. Joseph township school district from exercising any authority over a certain area in the township which plaintiffs claim had been legally annexed to the city school district. The circuit judge denied the relief sought, dismissed the bill of complaint, and the plaintiffs appeal.

On April 28, 1952, at an election held in the township and city areas affected by the proposed annexation, a majority of the electors voted for the annexation. On May 2, 1952, the legislature…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Attorney General of Michigan Ex Rel. Kies v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Kies v. LowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Barbour v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. Stormfeltz-Loveley Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frey v. Department of Management & BudgetMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Crawford v. School District No. 6Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Frey v. Department of Management & BudgetMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Heinze v. St. Joseph Township School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API