Legal Opinion

Merchant Truckmen's Bureau v. Reardon

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 14, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

With respect to several matters discussed in the argument, I think these things are clear and need not be further considered: (1) The petitioner is a competent complainant to the Commission; (2) what is presented to this court is not moot, the right to present it having been explicitly reserved at the hearing before the Examiner and the closing having been upon that condition (Minutes, pp. 44, 46, 88-95); (3) paragraph (3) of section 12 of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 USCA § 12 (3) empowers the court, on application of the petitioner, to make an order requiring…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Anchor Coal Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1928
  4. New York Dock Ry. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
  5. Fitzhenry v. Erie R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merchant Truckmen's Bureau v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  2. American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API