Legal Opinion

Fitzhenry v. Erie R.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 10, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

I regret the delay in disposing of this matter; but it has been unavoidable. The oral argument was on April 24. The principal briefs were furnished in about three weeks thereafter. In the meanwhile I had become absorbed in other court work having preference right to my time. Save for a short vacation, I have been continuously engaged ever since on that work. In consequence, there has not been earlier opportunity even physically to go over the papers.

Jurisdiction is invoked exclusively under subdivision 8 of section 24 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 41 (8). It is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaz Manufacturing Co. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Norris v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  3. Ispass v. Pyramid Motor Freight CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  4. G. P. Putnam's Sons v. Lancer Books, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Merchant Truckmen's Bureau v. ReardonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API