Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1933No. 1PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

The Galveston Commercial Association complained to the Interstate Commerce Commission that carload commodity rates on import, export and coastwise traffic between a portion of western classification térritory and Galvéston were unreasonable, arid their relationship with those tó and from Houston, Texas City, Beauriiont, Port Arthur, and Orange, Texas, and New Orleans, Ua., was unduly pre judical to Galveston.1 The claim of urireáson*631ableness was abandoned as was also the assertion of discrimination in favor of the other Texas ports. The latter intervened and prayed the same relief as might be…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Eastern-Central Motor Carriers Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Canton Railroad v. RoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API