American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, J.:
For more than 50 years some of the railroads in certain sections of the country were engaged in what is known as pick-up and delivery service in connection with the transportation by rail of merchandise traffic. The service, however, was neither continuous nor universal, but in those instances in which it existed, the Interstate Commerce Commission had uniformly held that it had jurisdiction to regulate it as part of the- transportation service by railroad. In 1932 the New England lines, with the exception of the New Haven and the Boston & Albany, established a regular pick-up and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- New York Dock Ry. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- New York Dock Ry. v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1932
- Merchant Truckmen's Bureau v. ReardonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson v. BigelowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Tews v. Renzenberger, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- United States ex rel. Arlington & F. Auto R. v. ElgenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Long Island Rail Road Company v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Bigelow v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.