Legal Opinion

People v. Braver

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1964No. Crim. 9031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

defendant was found guilty by a jury of the crimes of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470) and grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1) in a second trial, a jury having been unable to reach a verdict as to either charge in the first trial. He has appealed from the ensuing judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The case of the prosecution was that the defendant had signed the names of his uncle and aunt to a promissory note and chattel mortgage and had represented to George Kleck, the manager of the Los Angeles office of a finance company, that the signatures were genuine and that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. GeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. WynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. KatzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. People v. DubrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. State v. YarberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API