Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Mendenhall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1950No. 33552PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment sustaining a general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, in an action brought to rescind a contract, and recover money judgment from defendants, because of alleged fraud and misrepresentation in sale of property. Plaintiff elected to stand upon his petition and judgment was entered dismissing the action.

The appeal to this court is by transcript. The only question presented is whether the third amended petition stated a cause of action. Because of its length we do not set forth the entire petition, but the following sufficiently states the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. HarriganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Barry v. OrahoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Hazlett v. WilkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Myers v. ChamnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Tyler v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mehdipour v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Johnson v. EagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Ford Motor Credit Company v. R. Kenneth Milburn and Jane B. Milburn, Husband and Wife and Bobby J. Rogers and Marilyn A. Rogers, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Mehdipour v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Muskogee v. Muskogee Discount House of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API