Legal Opinion

White v. Harrigan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1919No. 9427PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; W. F. Freeman, Judge. Action by E. A. Harrigan et al. against S. O. White et al. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

In this opinion E. A. Harri-gan et al. will be referred to as plaintiffs, and S. O. White et al. as defendants; they so appearing in the trial court.

This is a suit by the plaintiffs to cancel a deed, alleged to have been secured from them by fraud, and certain other deeds and instruments of writing for the reason the same were a cloud on the title to the lands involved in this suit. The judgment of the trial court was in their favor, from which judgment an appeal to review the same has been taken to this court.

A deraignment of title of the parties to this suit is .as follows: Ed Punneo in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. PhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Rheingans v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Burford v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Johnson v. J. J. Douglass Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Thompson v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Bubbel v. Wien Air Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ford Motor Credit Company v. R. Kenneth Milburn and Jane B. Milburn, Husband and Wife and Bobby J. Rogers and Marilyn A. Rogers, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. NunneryMississippi Supreme Court · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API