Legal Opinion
Garde v. One 1992 Ford Explorer XLT Motor Vehicle, Vin No. 1FMDU34X3NUC11624
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 3, 2003No. C5-02-2142PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*166OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant city challenges the district court’s order granting summary judgment to respondent in a judicial forfeiture proceeding. Because we conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction, we reverse and remand for dismissal.
FACTS
On 20 March 2002, respondent John Garde was arrested and charged with first-degree driving while impaired (DWI). That same day, the state seized respondent’s vehicle, a 1992 Ford Explorer, and served respondent with a notice of seizure and intent to forfeit vehicle. On 18 April 2002, respondent filed a demand for judicial determination of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Strange v. 1997 Jeep Cherokee, New Mexico Lic. 630-KLD, VIN 1J4FJ2881VL502086Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mastakoski v. 2003 Dodge Durango, VIN 1D8HS78Z13F530764Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Garde v. One 1992 Ford Explorer XLT Motor Vehicle, Vin No. 1FMDU34X3NUC11624Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Kokosh v. $4657.00 U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Mastakoski v. 2003 Dodge Durango, VIN 1D8HS78Z13F530764Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007