Legal Opinion
Mastakoski v. 2003 Dodge Durango, VIN 1D8HS78Z13F530764
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 2007No. A06-2396Published
1Opinion of the Court
738 N.W.2d 411 (2007)
Chad Scott MASTAKOSKI, Appellant,
v.
2003 DODGE DURANGO, VIN # 1D8HS78Z13F530764, Respondent.
No. A06-2396.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
September 11, 2007.
Rachel C. Delich-Sullivan, Hibbing, MN, for appellant.
Melanie S. Ford, St. Louis County Attorney, Thomas G. Stanley, Assistant County Attorney, Duluth, MN, for respondent.
Considered and decided by WILLIS, Presiding Judge; RANDALL, Judge; and ROSS, Judge.
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the forfeiture of his vehicle, arguing that because he was not convicted of the designated offense on which the forfeiture was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.