Legal Opinion
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 14, 2010No. A10-232PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s (1) subject-matter jurisdiction over this forfeiture action; (2) award of storage and towing fees; and (3) award of attorney fees as a sanction. We affirm as to the district court’s jurisdiction and the award of towing and storage fees, reverse the sanctions, and remand.
FACTS
On September 19, 2008, respondent Scott Peterson was arrested for suspected violations of controlled-substances laws and his 2004 Ford Crown Victoria was seized by the Roseville Police Department for forfeiture pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.5314 (2008).…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Harlan v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kokosh v. $4657.00 U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- La'Mont Knazze, III, Okhui Cho-Knazze v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., CTX Mortgage Company LLC, d/b/a CTX Mortgage Company, and Land Title, Inc., and Christensen Law Office, PLLP, lienCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Thomas M. Fafinski v. Jaren JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016